Donuts in the Dark
Sorry, but black holes don’t exist
By Mark Luedtke
Dayton’s Conspiracy Theorist
Astronomers made one of the most fantastic claims in the history of science early in April when they claimed they had imaged a black hole for the first time. After a week or so, they produced an image they claimed was a black hole to great fanfare. The picture supposedly confirmed the existence of black holes, but it did no such thing.
To see why not, it’s worthwhile to revisit the propaganda reported before the picture was published.
Before the now-famous image was released but on the same day, Reuters reported, “News conferences are set in Washington, Brussels, Santiago, Shanghai, Taipei and Tokyo to disclose a ‘groundbreaking result’ from the Event Horizon Telescope (EHT) project, begun in 2012 to directly observe the immediate environment of a black hole using a global network of telescopes.”
The reason scientists made this out to be a big deal is it supposedly confirmed Einstein’s theory of general relativity, a pillar of establishment cosmology and a key to the government’s gravy train. You rarely read that Einstein himself doubted the existence of black holes.
The article adds, “The project targeted two supermassive black holes residing at the center of different galaxies….
”One of the black holes - Sagittarius A* - is situated at the center of our own Milky Way galaxy, possessing 4 million times the mass of our sun and located 26,000 light years from Earth. A light year is the distance light travels in a year, 5.9 trillion miles (9.5 trillion km).”
But we only saw one picture, supposedly of a black hole 54 million light years away in the relatively nearby galaxy of M87.
The Reuters article also contains a picture of the supposed black hole before it was computer processed for release. Take a look. It looks a lot less impressive. The program to process the image was written by a person who supports and is paid to support black hole theory so naturally the program produced an image biased toward displaying what black hole theory predicted.
Still, we saw no image of black hole. We saw a torus. A donut. Before we saw the photo, but probably not before he saw it, Yahoo News quoted Paul McNamara, an astrophysicist at the European Space Agency, regarding the image. “The light from behind the black hole gets bent like a lens. No matter what the orientation of the [accretion] disc, you will see it as a ring because of the black hole's strong gravity,” he described.
McNamara expected a donut, so the donut picture supported black hole theory.
This begs the question: why did they only release the picture from M87, not a picture of the black hole at the center of our galaxy which is thousands of times closer? I bet it doesn’t show a donut. If it did, they would have released it.
That’s because neither picture shows a black hole. Both show plasmoids, an electrical, plasma, phenomenon. The picture from M87 is looking down the the axis of the plasmoid, so we see a donut. The picture of Sagittarius A is looking from the side, so we don’t, so they didn’t release it.
Plasma donuts are common features in space, but establishment scientists ignore them because they falsify their theories. They capture electrical energy at all scales of the universe. The Earth is surrounded by donuts called the Van Allen Belts. Saturn’s rings are captured in donuts. The sun is encircled by a donut. The Milky Way is circled by a ring of stars, a donut. The donut at the core of galaxies including M87 and the Milky Way is produced by a plasmoid, a product of intertwined, intergalactic Birkeland currents.
The Thunderbolt Project’s picture of the day explained regarding the image, “Instead of a black hole, a plasmoid in M87’s heart is ramping up charged particles, so electrons spiral in the electromagnetic fields and give off X-rays and radio emissions. The idea that electricity flows through the Universe is resisted by today’s consensus, so its influence and attributes are unseen.”
In an interview, Wal Thornhill and Steve Smith described observations that falsify the theory that Sagittarius A is a supermassive black hole. Regarding stars forming close to the purported black hole, phys.org wrote, “At this distance, tidal forces driven by the supermassive black hole should be energetic enough to rip apart clouds of gas and dust before they can form stars.”
Also several years ago a cloud of gas, really plasma, approached the black hole but was not consumed or torn apart. National Geographic reported, “A cosmic gas cloud seemingly destined for a deadly encounter with the gigantic black hole at the core of the Milky Way has surprisingly survived a close pass by the monster's maw.”
After surviving, scientists’ claims mysteriously transformed the gas into a binary star system to save the theory. Government monopolization of science has created a new dark age for real science.
Follow me on Twitter
